Your name goes on the filing.
We make sure it holds up.
Court-ready motions with citations independently checked against CourtListener and PACER. Complete filing packages—not rough drafts that need rework.
Southern District of Texas
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
Plaintiff Jane Doe respectfully moves this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment on all claims against Defendant Acme Corporation. There is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The Supreme Court has held that summary judgment is appropriate when “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986)verified. The moving party bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 (1986)verified.
In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)verified. The nonmoving party must “do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” Id. at 586verified.
The Fifth Circuit has consistently applied these standards, holding that a party opposing summary judgment must “identify specific evidence in the record and articulate the manner in which that evidence supports that party's claim.” Ragas v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline Co., 136 F.3d 455, 458 (5th Cir. 1998)verified.
Drafted. Verified. Reviewed. Then delivered.
Every motion passes through 14 phases before it reaches your desk — including independent citation verification against CourtListener and PACER, a judicial-quality review, and two human checkpoints. Nothing ships unchecked.
Every filing package is formatted to your specific court's local rules — not generic templates. Caption blocks, margin requirements, font standards, page limits, and filing conventions are applied automatically based on your jurisdiction selection at intake.
You receive the full verification report with your filing package. Each cited authority is checked against CourtListener and PACER for existence and treatment history. Quoted passages are fuzzy-matched against the source opinion text where retrievable — with timestamps and source database for each citation. The report is your audit trail for ABA Opinion 512 compliance.
Three steps. You file.
Submit your matter, receive a court-ready filing package, review and sign. You stay in control from intake to filing.
Tell us about your case and the motion you need. The intake form takes about 5 minutes.
- Select motion type and jurisdiction
- Describe the key facts and legal issues
- Upload relevant case documents
- Choose standard or rush delivery
Your matter goes through a structured 14-phase drafting pipeline with attorney checkpoints built in.
- Applicable legal standards and rules identified
- Case law researched via CourtListener + PACER
- Motion and memorandum drafted with cited authority
- Each citation checked against CourtListener and PACER
- Opposition arguments anticipated and addressed
- Documents formatted to your court's local rules
Receive your complete filing package. Formatted and ready. Nothing left for you to clean up.
- Motion, memorandum, declarations, proposed order
- Citation verification report with timestamps
- Request revisions if needed—one round included
- File with your court when satisfied
A complete filing package. Every order.
No partial drafts. No raw output. Every order delivers a full set of court-ready documents formatted to your jurisdiction's local rules.
Formatted to your jurisdiction's local rules. All procedural requirements met. Court caption, party designations, and case number block complete.
jurisdiction: your court
formatting: local rules applied
Full legal argument with cited authority organized by issue. Reviewed for argument structure, clarity, and persuasive strength.
arg structure: reviewed
opposition: anticipated
Counsel or party declarations drafted for your review and signature. Formatted with all required evidentiary statements.
status: ready to sign
scope: counsel or party
Court-ready order formatted for the judge's signature. Includes all required relief language per your court's local rules.
relief: as requested
formatting: local rules
Line-by-line audit of each citation. Verification status, provenance, and timestamp for each. Existence confirmed, treatment history checked, quoted language cross-referenced where opinion text is available.
flags: surfaced for review
sources: CourtListener + PACER
Substantive revisions returned within 24 hours. If your facts shift or you want a different argument framed, one complete revision round is included.
scope: substantive
cost: included in price
Each citation checked. Independently.
The difference between Motion Ready and any other drafting tool is what happens after the draft exists. Each citation goes through a three-step verification process before your package ships.
eyecite extracts every citation from the draft—full citations, short-form citations, and id. references alike.
- Full citations identified and normalized
- Short-form and id. citations resolved to source
- Reporter, volume, page, and pinpoint extracted
Each citation checked against CourtListener's growing database of judicial opinions and PACER federal court records.
- Case existence confirmed
- Treatment history checked against CourtListener
- Quoted passages fuzzy-matched against retrieved opinion text where available
Line-by-line verification report delivered with your filing package. Full provenance and timestamps for every citation.
- Pass/fail status for each citation
- Source database and verification timestamp
- ABA Opinion 512 audit trail included
Flat-fee pricing. No surprises.
Every tier includes your complete filing package, citation verification report, and one revision round. No hourly billing.
72-hour rush (+25%) and 24-hour rush (+50%) available at checkout.
Why Motion Ready
Not all AI drafting is created equal.
| Unverified AI Drafts | Motion ReadyRecommended | |
|---|---|---|
| Citations | Hallucinated or outdated | Each citation checked against CourtListener + PACER |
| Good law check | None — could cite overruled cases | Appellate history checked, bad law flagged |
| Court formatting | Generic output | Jurisdiction-specific (TX rules, local court rules) |
| Review process | You're the only safety net | 14-phase pipeline with human checkpoints |
| What you receive | A rough draft | Complete filing package — motion, proposed order, certificate of service, verification report |
| Revisions | Start over | One round included |
| Confidentiality | Data may be used for training | Encrypted at rest and in transit, never used for training |
| ABA compliance | Your responsibility | Built for ABA Opinion 512 compliance |
| Sanctions risk | Attorneys have been sanctioned | Verification report with timestamps on each citation checked |
| Pricing | "Free" — but costs you 20–40 hours | Flat fee, $299–$1,799 |
Courts are sanctioning attorneys for unverified AI citations.
These are real, public cases. The common thread: AI-generated legal text filed without independent citation verification.
Attorney relied on AI-generated research that fabricated six case citations. None of the cited cases existed. The court imposed monetary sanctions under FRCP 11 and required written notice to every affected client.
Eastern District of Texas sanctioned attorney for filing AI-generated brief containing fabricated citations and quotations in a wrongful termination case. Court found counsel failed to verify any of the cited authorities before filing.
Federal court sanctioned counsel after AI-generated filing contained fabricated case citations. Published in the Federal Rules Decisions reporter, establishing binding precedent on attorney obligations when using AI tools.
Each citation is checked against CourtListener and PACER for existence, treatment history, and the proposition it supports. You receive the full verification report with timestamps before you file.
Motion Ready’s citation verification checks the existence, holding, treatment history, and quoted text of cited authorities. It does not independently verify dollar amounts, damages figures, sanctions amounts, or other factual figures stated in the motion. The supervising attorney remains solely responsible for independently confirming all non-citation factual content before filing.
Your next motion is due.
File it with confidence.
Submit your matter in 5 minutes. Receive a court-ready filing package with citations independently checked against CourtListener and PACER. You review it, you file it—the research and drafting are handled.
Flat-fee pricing · No subscription · Each citation checked before delivery