Skip to main content
MOTION DRAFTING SERVICE FOR TEXAS SOLO & SMALL-FIRM ATTORNEYS
Accepting new matters

Your name goes on the filing.
We make sure it holds up.

A complete Texas filing package, every citation independently checked against CourtListener and PACER — with the timestamped verification report delivered before you file.

Submit in about 5 minutes — every motion gets the full 14-step review.

Flat fees $299–$1,799 · 2–7 business days · 72-hour & 24-hour rush available · One substantive revision round included · Texas state + federal courts
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:26-cv-01234
v.
ACME CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment

Plaintiff Jane Doe respectfully moves this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment on all claims against Defendant Acme Corporation. There is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The Supreme Court has held that summary judgment is appropriate when “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986)verified. The moving party bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 (1986)verified.

In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)verified. The nonmoving party must “do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” Id. at 586verified.

The Fifth Circuit has consistently applied these standards, holding that a party opposing summary judgment must “identify specific evidence in the record and articulate the manner in which that evidence supports that party's claim.” Ragas v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline Co., 136 F.3d 455, 458 (5th Cir. 1998)verified.

Sample output · Citations highlighted with verification status
Trusted by solo practitioners and small firms across Texas
ABA Opinion 512 Audit Trail
Data Isolated & Encrypted
2–7 Business-Day Delivery

Courts are sanctioning attorneys for unverified AI citations.

Three real, public cases — AI-drafted filings, no independent citation check.

E.D. Tex. 2024$2,000 sanction
Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
No. 1:23-CV-281

Sanctioned for an AI-generated brief with fabricated citations and quotations — counsel had verified none of the cited authorities before filing.

S.D.N.Y. 2023$5,000 sanction
Mata v. Avianca, Inc.
No. 22-cv-1461 (PKC)

Six AI-fabricated citations — none of the cases existed. Sanctions under FRCP 11, plus written notice to every affected client.

D. Wyo. 2025$3,000 sanction
Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc.
348 F.R.D. 489

AI-fabricated citations in a federal filing. Published in the Federal Rules Decisions reporter — citable authority on attorneys’ duties when using AI.

How we answer this

Each citation is checked against CourtListener and PACER for existence, treatment history, and the proposition it supports. Some Texas federal judges now require attorneys to certify how AI was used in filings. Your verification report is a timestamped record of what was checked, when, and against which source.

Motion Ready’s citation verification checks the existence, holding, treatment history, and quoted text of cited authorities. It does not independently verify dollar amounts, damages figures, sanctions amounts, or other factual figures stated in the motion. The supervising attorney remains solely responsible for independently confirming all non-citation factual content before filing.

See how every citation is checked →

Drafted. Verified. Reviewed. Then delivered.

14 steps before it reaches your desk — independent citation verification, a judicial-quality review, and two human checkpoints. Nothing reaches you unchecked.

Motion Status
Riverside Holdings v. Camden Mfg. · No. 2026-CI-08412 · Bexar County District Court · Sample Order
In Review
11 of 14 steps completeNow: Supporting Documents
01–03
Intake & Legal Research3 stepsHuman checkpoint
Motion for Summary Judgment classified · key facts from 4 uploads · elements and burdens mapped
Done
08:42 CT
04
Deep Research
9 authorities found via CourtListener
Done
09:18 CT
05
Motion Drafting
Full draft with 7 cited authorities
Done
10:05 CT
06
Citation Verification
7-step review — 7/7 citations verified against CourtListener and PACER
7/7 Pass
10:31 CT
07
Opposition Analysis
4 counterarguments anticipated
Done
10:54 CT
08
Judicial Quality Review
Grade: A− · threshold: B+
A− Pass
11:22 CT
09–11
Revisions & Validation3 steps
Re-verified 2 revised citations · caption fields checked against the order
Done
11:49 CT
12
Supporting Documents
Declaration, proposed order, memorandum
In Progress
13
Final Citation Sweep
Every citation re-checked before assembly
Pending
14
Final Assembly & ApprovalHuman checkpoint
Pauses for your review before delivery
Pending
Citation Verification Report
7-step independent review · CourtListener + PACER · Sample Order
7/7 Verified
7/7
Citations verified
0
Issues detected
A−
Quality grade · B+ threshold
City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:18 CT
Timpte Indus. v. Gish, 286 S.W.3d 306 (Tex. 2009)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:20 CT
Dow Chem. Co. v. Francis, 46 S.W.3d 237 (Tex. 2001)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:22 CT
Provident Life v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211 (Tex. 2003)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:24 CT
Ragas v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline, 136 F.3d 455 (5th Cir. 1998)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
PACER10:26 CT
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:28 CT
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
ExistsTreatment checkedQuote matched
CourtListener10:30 CT
Delivered with every filing package — timestamps and source database for each citation.
Formatted to Your Court's Rules

Formatted to your specific court's local rules — not generic templates. Applied automatically from your jurisdiction selection at intake.

TX State
Tex. R. Civ. P. formatting, county-specific caption
S.D. Tex.
Local Rules 5, 7 — ECF conventions, 25-page brief limit
N.D. Tex.
Local Rules 7.1, 7.2 — separate brief required, TOA format
E.D. Tex.
Local Rule CV-7(a) — 14-point font, 1" margins
W.D. Tex.
Local Rules CV-7(b), CV-7(e) — appendix requirements

The draft is the easy part. Every citation passes a 7-step verification before your package is delivered — and the report is delivered with it.

7-step verification on every citationCourtListener + PACER cross-referenceBuilt for Texas state + federal courtsFull audit trail with timestamps

Outsource the drafting. You review, you file.

You bring the facts. We build the motion. You review, sign, and file.

01
Submit your matter

Tell us about your case and the motion you need — about 5 minutes.

  • Select motion type and jurisdiction
  • Describe the key facts and legal issues
  • Upload relevant case documents
~5 MINUTES
02
We draft and verify

A structured 14-step workflow with two human checkpoints built in.

  • Motion and memorandum drafted with cited authority
  • Each citation checked against CourtListener and PACER
  • Formatted to your court's local rules
2–7 BUSINESS DAYS
03
You review and file

A complete filing package as editable Word and PDF — nothing left to clean up.

  • Motion, memorandum, declarations, proposed order
  • Citation verification report with timestamps
  • One substantive revision round included
YOU'RE IN CONTROL

A complete filing package. Every order.

Court-ready documents as editable Word and PDF, formatted to your jurisdiction's local rules.

Document 1
Motion Document

Formatted to your jurisdiction's local rules — caption, parties, and case number complete.

format: court motion
jurisdiction: your court
formatting: local rules applied
Document 3
Supporting Declaration(s)

Counsel or party declarations, ready for review and signature.

format: declaration
status: ready to sign
scope: counsel or party
Document 4
Proposed Order

Court-ready order formatted for the judge's signature.

format: proposed order
relief: as requested
formatting: local rules
Included
One Revision Round

Every order includes one substantive revision round at no additional charge, returned within 24 hours.

turnaround: 24 hours
scope: substantive
cost: included in price

Flat-fee pricing. No surprises.

Every tier includes the complete filing package, verification report, and one revision round. The price on the page is the price at checkout.

TIER A
Procedural / Routine
flat fee
$299
2–3 BUSINESS DAYS
Motion to Continue · Extend Deadline · Withdraw as Counsel · Pro Hac Vice · Motion to Seal
TIER B
Intermediate
flat fee
$599
3–4 BUSINESS DAYS
Motion to Compel · Protective Order · Quash Subpoena · Special Exceptions · Motion in Limine
TIER D
Dispositive / High-Stakes
flat fee
$1,799
5–7 BUSINESS DAYS
MSJ · No-Evidence MSJ (TRCP 166a(i)) · Class Certification · Preliminary Injunction · TRO · Daubert

72-hour rush (+25%) and 24-hour rush (+50%) available on any order.

Why Motion Ready

Not all AI drafting is created equal.

See the full comparison
Citations

Unverified AI Drafts

Hallucinated or outdated

Motion Ready

Each citation checked against CourtListener + PACER

Good law check

Unverified AI Drafts

None — could cite overruled cases

Motion Ready

Appellate history checked, bad law flagged

Review process

Unverified AI Drafts

You're the only safety net

Motion Ready

14-step workflow with human checkpoints

What you receive

Unverified AI Drafts

A rough draft

Motion Ready

Complete filing package — motion, memorandum of points & authorities, supporting declaration(s), proposed order, citation verification report

Revisions

Unverified AI Drafts

Start over

Motion Ready

One substantive revision round included

Pricing

Unverified AI Drafts

"Free" — until you spend the hours drafting, checking, and reformatting it yourself.

Motion Ready

Flat fee, $299–$1,799

AES-256 Encryption
At rest; TLS 1.3 in transit
SOC 2 Infrastructure
Hosted on SOC 2 Type II certified platforms
ABA Opinion 512
Timestamped audit trail for your supervision duties
No AI Training
No model training on your data, per provider terms
Full Audit Trail
Timestamped verification report on each citation checked

Your matter information is handled with the same confidentiality obligations that govern attorney-client communications — see how we handle confidentiality →

Motion Ready is software that assists licensed attorneys. It is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice (Tex. Gov. Code §81.101(c)). You remain the supervising attorney of record. Compliance & Ethics FAQ →

Built by a small team focused exclusively on Texas litigation. Questions? support@motion-ready.com — we respond within one business day.

Your next motion is due.
File it with confidence.

Submit your matter in 5 minutes. You review it, you file it — we handle the research and drafting.

Flat-fee pricing · No subscription · Each citation checked before delivery · Questions? Read the FAQ